Subscribe to the blog and receive recommendations to boost your CX
Managing a debt collection contact center today is a balancing act. On one hand, financial pressure demands immediate results in debt recovery; on the other, the need to retain the customer requires caring for the experience even in the most tense moments.
In this context, relying on traditional reports of calls made provides an incomplete vision. Current debt collection KPIs should not only explain what happened, but also help you to anticipate behaviors, detect friction, and decide where to adjust the strategy to maximize the return.
It is no longer just about persistence, but about understanding and acting with judgment. Below, we review the financial, operational, and experience indicators that should be kept in mind in a debt collection contact center.
1. Financial KPIs: the real thermometer of recovery
Beyond cash flow, these indicators reveal the health of your segmentation strategy and the real effectiveness of your efforts:
- Recovery rate: this is the king of metrics. To be actionable, it is best to break it down by delinquency stages (early, late, written-off) and by channel. If the rate in early delinquency falls, the problem is usually reachability; if it falls in late delinquency, it is usually a negotiation issue.
- Time-to-cure vs. average days delinquent: while days delinquent show a static picture of the debt, time-to-cure measures the speed of your team from the moment the account enters management until it is regularized. Reducing it frees up operational resources for more complex accounts.counts.
2. Operational KPIs: metrics to stop persisting and start converting
The goal is to stop making calls and start generating valuable contacts. These operational KPIs help you to measure the quality of the contact, the solidity of the agreements, and the real weight of automation in debt recovery:
- Right party contact rate (RPC): this measures the health of your database and the intelligence of your dialing strategy. If this indicator is low, it is time to review the contact times or the quality of the data in the debt collection crm.
- Promises to pay (PTP) and “kept rate”: obtaining the promise only gets you halfway there. The critical indicator is the PTP kept rate (fulfilled promises). A low rate here indicates that agents are closing unviable agreements under too much pressure.
- Containment rate: this is vital when using automation solutions with ai agents, as it measures the percentage of interactions that the technology resolves from start to finish without human intervention.
3. Experience KPIs: collecting without breaking the relationship
In debt collection, the customer experience is the engine of long-term recovery. A customer who is treated well during their debt is a customer who will buy again.
The debt collection fcr (first contact resolution) refers to an indicator of commercial agility. It measures the percentage of cases that close with a payment or a valid promise without the need for callbacks or transfers. There is a direct correlation: fewer delays and handovers generate a higher conversion.
With Inagent, for example, frequent objections can be resolved and payment actions can be enabled when the customer is ready to regularize. Furthermore, it is an easy improvement to validate with data, because what occurs in the conversation is contrasted with the actual payment confirmation in the ERP.
In parallel, we must monitor the contact fatigue index, a strategic KPI that measures the wear and tear of the debtor given the frequency of attempts. If we detect signals of exhaustion (number blocking in Inconnect, opt-outs in Infunnel, or complaints detected by conversational analytics with solutions such as Inspeech), excessive contact attempts will only serve to undermine the fulfillment of promises. The strategic response is to apply dynamic saturation limits in Infunnel, allowing the system to pause management or automatically change the channel and the tone.
Finally, the complaints rate and the post-collection nps serve as the definitive thermometer to ensure that we are recovering the portfolio with empathy and clarity, protecting the brand reputation.
4. Cross-KPIs and advanced analytics: how to connect metrics to improve return
The true value emerges when you cross-reference data to make business decisions. This is where debt collection automation and analytics play their fundamental role in optimizing portfolio recovery.
A strategic indicator at this point is the channel efficiency (cost to collect), which calculates how much it costs to recover each monetary unit per channel. Often, the telephone has a higher gross recovery rate, but digital channels offer a superior profitability margin in certain delinquency stages, allowing human talent to be reserved for complex negotiations.
From reminders to predictive recovery: a strategic flow
To illustrate how these indicators truly transform the operation, we can imagine an optimized management flow:
- Instead of burdening the human team with repetitive contacts, a proactive strategy is activated through WhatsApp reminders that include direct payment links. With this simple adjustment, part of the volume is resolved without agent intervention, which improves the containment rate and significantly reduces the cost to collect.
- If at that point the person responds with a difficulty (“I cannot do it now”, “the amount does not match”, “I need to postpone it”), a virtual agent comes into play. Its role is to manage common objections and propose alternatives following predefined debt collection strategies and rules: for example, agreeing on a specific date or establishing a realistic promise to pay. Thus, the PTP rate increases without depending on having an agent available for every case.
- And when the system detects that the situation requires more judgment (due to a complex payment intent, high amount, or risk profile), the interaction is intelligently escalated to a contact center specialist. That specialist receives the case with all the previous context (contact history, objections, responses, and previous agreements), which helps them to close more cases on the first contact (better FCR) and shorten the time until regularization (lower time-to-cure).
Overall, the strategic leap is found in this balance: automating the repetitive, escalating what adds value, and making decisions with data (not with intuition).
How Inconcert technology boosts your indicators
Having clear KPI is only the starting point. The true competitive leap arrives when you have the technology capable of positively impacting every phase of management: from contact to negotiation, closing, and quality control.
The Inconcert solution ecosystem is designed precisely to target each of these metrics:
- Inconnect orchestrates omnichannel communication to improve the right party contact rate, coordinating campaigns and channels to reach the right people sooner (and better).
- Infunnel manages proactive strategies and controls contact fatigue through intelligent rules, adjusting cadences, pauses, channels, and tone according to response and context.
- Inagent automates negotiation empathetically to improve the containment rate and, at the same time, free up your agents for the complex cases that truly move the financial needle.
- Inspeech uses voice and text analytics to audit 100% of interactions, which is key to raising the FCR and reinforcing regulatory compliance with real visibility into what occurs in every conversation.
All of this is complemented by a layer of control and continuous learning. When you can measure, compare, and adjust in short cycles, improvement stops depending on intuition and becomes a method.
In the end, success in portfolio recovery does not reside in how many times we call, but in how many agile and human solutions we manage to build with the customer. If you wish, we can review your current metrics and see which solutions can accelerate your recovery without straining the experience. Request your demo now.


